|
|
Post by wtm97 on Feb 3, 2014 6:47:32 GMT -5
After last night's debacle, expecting Boston talk radio to crucify Peyton Manning this morning in the on-going and never ending blah-blah-blah Brady Vs. Manning debate. Watching that game though made me doubt the Pats would have done any better vs. those young and destined Seahawks...
Still, Manning's post-season woes are evident; stats are prety bad overall.
|
|
mikemc
Friar Fanatic
Posts: 3,271
|
Post by mikemc on Feb 3, 2014 7:28:20 GMT -5
Deer in the headlights!!
|
|
|
|
Manning
Feb 3, 2014 13:25:13 GMT -5
Post by Rock on Feb 3, 2014 13:25:13 GMT -5
Pats didn't earn the right to be there but if they did they would not have lost like that. They would have lost, absolutely, but not by more than 10-13 max. BB with two weeks to prep vs John Fox prepping for two weeks would have created a stiffer challenge for Pete Carroll and his team.
As for Manning? He gets all the glory (and never hides or deflects from it), all the time so when they suck like yesterday it rightful sits on his head first. "Peyton" got all the credit in the AFC title game when he was never touched, not once, by the Pats and had a deep, talented artillery to work with. Two weeks later, make him move (same artillery at his disposal) and he can't do much. Manning apologists call out the O Line for yesterday, strangely a bit silent about said O Line two weeks ago.
|
|
