|
Post by thewalk on Jul 21, 2015 17:16:44 GMT -5
as I said they get hooked...they avoid the extra game 100% of the time...that is more bullchit than getting home court imo...
|
|
|
Post by thumper on Jul 21, 2015 20:42:37 GMT -5
as I said...have 2 play-in locations...otherwise Dayton gets hooked up if they come in 65 -68 (or whatever the real at large #s are) and some other team has to play an extra game. Now they can make Dayton come in at 64 instead of 65-68. That's the added flexibility. flyerlax06, don't you know by now that whatever thewalk says is the only way things can be. There is no room for reason, explanations or differing opinions.. We are all living in his world where he makes the rules and interpretations. PIZZA, SODA, GRINDERS!!!
|
|
|
Post by thewalk on Jul 21, 2015 21:35:29 GMT -5
Ahhh thump....lax made the incorrect assumption that Dayton was sent to Columbus for travel purposes....the perceived screw job was pc playing a lower seed close to their campus....nothing has been done about that...at least not that I know of.
|
|
|
Post by flyerlax06 on Jul 22, 2015 8:51:15 GMT -5
My original point was about the First 4 games. It would have been a lot easier for the committee to move Dayton away from Columbus (like to Louisville) if the Flyers only had to play a Second Round game and travel accordingly. From my perspective being able to scrub Dayton out of the First 4 games means there is a much greater chance they move them out of Columbus. Again, nothing that can be proven until the situation comes up again but that's my opinion.
|
|
|
Post by thewalk on Jul 22, 2015 13:09:16 GMT -5
..and since there is no historical evidence of keeping the play-in winners close to Dayton, i'll stick with mine...Dayton is now eliminated from the play in games which is total crap...
|
|
|
Post by flyerlax06 on Jul 22, 2015 18:55:27 GMT -5
...First 4 has been around for 4 years. Tons of history to peruse...
|
|